kislorod

Ivan Vyrypaev: I make you believe what is not

Playwright and director - on how to talk, feelings of strength, the creators of tricks

Art today - is producing. That is, we're in the consumption of art. Most of what we do - it's not something that "I did this show and got in your heart." My task - to convince you that I did this show and got in your heart. I make you believe what is not, produces invisible. I said: "This is a cool movie!" - In every way attacking you before you arrive, or after - so that when you look and feel that you are not "hits", but has bewitched my hypnosis, convinces themselves ... And when you ask: "How a film?" - you say: "Cool!"
Currently deep experience does not mean the underlying themes: the authenticity of the experience can not replace and should not sprodyusirovat.Here you come home to her friend, drank tea with her, talked ... about the new cabinet - and left with a feeling of warmth. Something happened, you've got the experience - what? What you said, or the experience called "smile", "good mood"? Then they came for the other person and talk to him about God - or even argue about being on the other side of death, but have not experienced anything deep. What do you feel at the exit - that's the question. Art that is the perception. I said: "This play is about love - love, but there is thought" this is a play about love, that is consumption. Why not art? Because there is consumption. We seemed to convince the audience: "I saw a beautiful film about love?" - "Saw." But the love was not.
The nature of creativity, that is the experience itself, for example, the play - is that happening to you. You can not get the experience that your country is going the wrong way, or experience that drugs are harmful, at the level of thought. You can only get experience: I suffer, I'm upset, I love, I hate, I resent.The history of the theater begins with the fact that the actor got to buskins, and now we come to a video installation - but the theater is still there is nothing but perception. Everything you do on stage - you correctly organize the viewer's attention and to develop his impressions.
Now, if I am going to just say: war and confusion can kill the love between two people. Enough? No! I need to get you soperezhit this topic, I have to "Romeo and Juliet," you play! How does the modern theater? I take the girl out of Bosnia, and the boy from Montenegro - well, or there from Chechnya. And show you conceptually, it's different worlds ... you sit, thinking: "Damn, well, exactly ... Yes!" But this experience of love - it can happen, but maybe not. It will not depend on whether I took the girl out of Bosnia or not. It can play two old men. The main thing that we knew in his heart that our war, the horrors that we carry, our zakompleksovannost - they kill the love between two people.Then Shakespeare will be performed. Why we know Shakespeare? This is exactly found Connect for its time. I think that today more problems than in the days of Shakespeare. What is the problem of mankind? The fact that technology advances faster than awareness of what is happening. Television is not used as it should be used: to help those in need, the sick, to report on the state of the planet and so on - the television only to entertain and raise money ... Yes, we can not recognize even a mobile phone! James Cameron film "Avatar" has not done anything new in the evolution of cinematic art. It's not modern art, this new technology. We speak: «3D» - no, the viewer little to 4D - no, not like it, you need to 5D ». We were captured by the news. Artist to be relevant, forced all the time something new is ... panties removed - "Oh!Cool! "- Hit! The second time panties removed - "Not th ... need to cut the balls!" But in fact you can not go after this information flow, and to stop and find a way to talk. Here Grishkovec - on stage two rags, one person. What he's said - I do not remember a single thought remained, but I remember feeling: talk to me man ... weird, who knows life ... Right here and now, with me!
Grishkovec acts on the Stanislavsky system, only the partner had not stood on a stage person, and the audience, sitting in the hall. He came out with a goal - "I want to change my room, I want to them that something had happened" - and he does it! Hence, the present - it is still the language in which we speak, not verbal language, and language perception. When the scene said: "... Hey, dude, give me s ... nd me his cell phone, I tell you right now ..." - then there is no present for me does not arise. Often, contemporary reality is placed in the old way of dialogue, as if I was in the times of Pushkin and his tongue started to talk about the crooked very important things. He would have said to me: "Son, I do not understand what you mean ...
Why is the new drama can not make a breakthrough? Because, dropping school, Fomenko, Kama Ginkas, went ahead without taking some professional equipment and also have not noticed change of perception.Before the ideas will be performed, they should get into the heart of man, and it needs to speak to him in one language. I was at a concert band U2.American guy from the scene says about social justice, but about anything he says about what he wants to say "Teatr.doc" - and ninety thousand people take it with open arms, sobbing. Ninety-thousand and three hundred people!Why? Because U2 - a new drama, Bono - is theater. What is the difference that he does not speak the text. Of course, we can tell, the music always gets more accurate in us, but perhaps we should devise a new drama, which enters into us.
Director and playwright are obliged to put out of the auditorium, they should be, above all viewers. What is the problem of modern drama? People are beginning to reinvent the theater. I have an example - the man handed a request for a very interesting piece. Then came the "new drama", understood as an actor there - well, and continued in the same aesthetics of something myself. That is no longer a spectator, stopped thinking about what play he wanted to see. Each of us has in his heart has a play and a poem, but not everyone can hear themselves and professionally express. That is the modern art - to open the fact that we have, rather than invent. The director must be educated in any case - not in the sense that it has hundreds of books to read and deal with issues of perception. Do not get me wrong or something esoteric, but I think, for example, that practicing yoga for the modern director's more necessary than the other classes. To understand what is canon.Because the play - it's canon. Principles of art exhaustively formulated Florensky in his famous work "The iconostasis. Canon has a relationship with the other, that is the altar ... we have school, but it needs to be combined with the sensation. Should read Florenski watch a movie Banksy's "Exit Through the Gift Shop, take the system Vakhtangov ... and stop drinking, at least for a while!

kislorod

Κυριακή 8 Μαΐου 2011

Συνέντευξη του Ιβάν βιριπάεφ.η μετάφραση έγινε απο google translate.

Δευτέρα 18 Απριλίου 2011

Τρίτη 16 Νοεμβρίου 2010

religion

documentaries